data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/15305/153051a939225f97cbcc388d11b1efee5a4ebc91" alt=""
The only problem is, I don't think it's real linotype. I measured it using a Lee Hardness tester and it measured at about Brinell 16.6 (the measured diameter was .056). I measured it twice and came up with the same measurement each time, then I measure some pure lead to make sure I was measuring correctly. The pure lead measured about BNH 7, so I know I'm close.
As I remember, the Brinell Hardness of various alloys are about:
Linotype = BNH 22
Lyman #2 alloy = BNH 16
Standard wheelweights = BNH 10 or 12
Pure lead = BNH 6-8
So, if those BNH numbers still hold, what the guys at the print shop gave me is an alloy they use that closely approximates Lyman #2. It ain't linotype, but I'm not complaining. I'm going to use this metal to make bullets for the .357 magnum, both for the pistol and for the rifle. It's going to be a 180 grain semi-wadcutter hunting bullet with a wide meplat.
I'm wondering if that alloy would be too hard for hunting bullets, or if I need to mix it with some pure lead? Or mix it with some wheelweight metal? Is Lyman #2 too hard to use as a hunting bullet?
I need to cross-post this question over at the Cast Bullet Assoc forum.
1 comment:
There are some very good articles by Glen Fryxell about cast bullet hardness, alloys and such at
http://www.lasc.us/ArticlesFryxell.htm
Hope this helps.
Post a Comment