There is no need for a warrant; there is no probable cause requirement; and the Seattle Times columnist writing about this clearly unconstitutional law observes that the sponsors include “Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, a lawyer who typically is hyper-attuned to civil-liberties issues.”That's the agenda, ladies and gentleman. Violations of both the Second and Fourth Amendments, couched as a public safety argument. Imagine the furor if an elected representative from Louisiana, Alabama, or Texas proposed that the police be required to inspect homosexuals homes to make sure that they weren't abusing little boys and girls?
The Democrats want full control and a ban on certain firearms that many of us find useful, interesting, and perfectly legal, but Washington Democrats are willing to abuse the Fourth Amendment to advance their agenda. This isn't the first time they've tried, either. This is about control, plain and simple.
2 comments:
I do love when both the sponsored authors were called on this provision, they both replied with some kind of ignorant excuse like, "Oh! I didn't know THAT was in there..."
Concur, it's ALL about control (and only of the things 'they' don't like.
Post a Comment