It seems that over the weekend, a federal immigration judge says that Whatshisname Khalil can be deported under current immigration law. Khalil, you may recall is a foreigner, married to a US citizen, studying at Columbia university, and a leader in a pro-Hamas group that has been disrupting the campus and threatening Jewish students. SecState Marco Rubio had him detained and he is currently held in a detention facility i Jena, LA, awaiting final judgement.
Khalil's lawyers say that he is entitled to First Amendment protections. The government disagress, under an immigration law that allows the SecState to declare some immigrants to be deported whenthey are stirring up crap.
I wonder how the defense lawyers would react if Khalil was an avowed Nazi and was riling up students to threaten and harm black students on campus? I'm aware that Khalil is entitled to some degree of due process in this country, but I don't believe that he should expect the dame level of due process as a citizen.
If you're comig over here to study, that's fine. Mind your manners.
3 comments:
He’s not a citizen, which leaves two categories, he’s a guest (several categories there) or he’s an illegal. In either of those two categories the Government can require him to leave if needed. Sounds like that should describe him. Course the fools on the left don’t see it that way.
juvat
Setting aside that I am rather uncomfortable with this administration (or really any administration) arbitrarily deciding who gets constitutional rights.
Arbitrarily changing the rules of the our society and their enforcement retroactively seems problematic. Even if one likes these new rules/ enforcement of rules we should clearly tell people what we are doing. That is how proper countries do things, not this 3rd world arbitrary whatever the strong man feels like today madness.
What part of him being a guest in this country is unclear? Guest means being on your best behavior and not advocating for murderous scum like Hamas.
Post a Comment