Did y'all see this? It looks like Ukraine loaded some drones in commercial shipping containers and had then strategically delivered to Russia. Then, the remotely launched them and used then to target Russian Air Force assets.
Just dam. That is inventive. Why invest in a long-range bomber, when a $5K drone will do the same job, cleaner, cheaper, and with less collateral damage?
6 comments:
It WAS very well planned. Reports were the drivers of these trailers weren't aware of what they were pulling. The scary part - what if someone pulls that here in the continental U.S.A. ?
Well done, no question! :-)
OK, now think about China buying land near our military bases. I'm thinking a barn full of drones.
Drones can't carry nuclear weapons, yet. They attacked strategic aircraft. How would we take it if someone attacked a silo or a SSBN? This really is playing with fire for very little gain.
Russians-due to immediate change in tactical picture we will be hiding our nuclear assets going forward, in violation of the SALT treaty, recommend ya'll do the same. OOPS.
Seriously, this is Ukraine trying to provoke escalation beyond proxy war. And the analysis I have read is NATO/US intel was required. I don't know, but what do the Russians believe? That is the salient question.
Escalation without the ability to change the picture in the Ukraine at all. The question we need to debate is stopping Russia in the Ukraine worth NATO and the US going to war. That is the path we are on.
This is why China is building Hardened Aircraft Shelters (HAS) and why many US experts say the US should be building more, especially at our Pacific bases that are likely targets for China.
Concrete is far cheaper than airframes or avionics...
Jonathan
Citizen's Watch Report on X: A sitting U.S. Congressman—Jerry Nadler—caught with military-grade drone warfare tech in his office…
Encrypted triggers. Global strike capabilities.
Weapons of war in the hands of a member of the Democrat Party. (Party of Theft and treason.)
Post a Comment