Saturday, September 22, 2018

An Argument for Octagon Barrels

I've been trying to learn to produce low-cost, YouTube videos.  It's a lot harder than it looks.  A little 8-minute video on the argument for octagon barrels took me seven hours.  You do not want to see the out-takes.  But, I feel pretty good about it.  Lots of editing.


Time for a stiff drink.

5 comments:

Old NFO said...

Nicely done, but you need to check spelling on Branded on your bumper in.

Pawpaw said...

Good catch, Jim. Thanks. On review I found another misspelling. Marshal has only one "L". I'm editing it now and it should be correct very soon. (It takes FOREVER to upload a You Tube video.

The Displaced Louisiana Guy said...

Well done. Good presentation of a lot of the facts we have discussed on the situation. If it were me voting on such things, I'd be glad to have the opportunity to hear your arguments. I hope it gets disseminated widely in the CFDA community!

The Displaced Louisiana Guy said...

Oh, and if you are putting it out on the CFDA Facebook page, remember to type up a quick explanation about how it's more period correct to an original 1873 than Stainless Vaquero!

Pawpaw said...

I hear you, son, but the stainless vaquero is probably the most popular revolver in CFDA. I've made that argument, and it offended a host of people.