Saturday, September 22, 2018

An Argument for Octagon Barrels

I've been trying to learn to produce low-cost, YouTube videos.  It's a lot harder than it looks.  A little 8-minute video on the argument for octagon barrels took me seven hours.  You do not want to see the out-takes.  But, I feel pretty good about it.  Lots of editing.


Time for a stiff drink.

5 comments:

  1. Nicely done, but you need to check spelling on Branded on your bumper in.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good catch, Jim. Thanks. On review I found another misspelling. Marshal has only one "L". I'm editing it now and it should be correct very soon. (It takes FOREVER to upload a You Tube video.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well done. Good presentation of a lot of the facts we have discussed on the situation. If it were me voting on such things, I'd be glad to have the opportunity to hear your arguments. I hope it gets disseminated widely in the CFDA community!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh, and if you are putting it out on the CFDA Facebook page, remember to type up a quick explanation about how it's more period correct to an original 1873 than Stainless Vaquero!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I hear you, son, but the stainless vaquero is probably the most popular revolver in CFDA. I've made that argument, and it offended a host of people.

    ReplyDelete

Comments are moderated. Don't freak out.