While I wasn't paying attention, it looks like Hillary Clinton descended into the realm of the farcical during the debate. The woman understand nothing about guns, understand little about the law, and exposes her ignorance on both subjects
when she tries to combine them.
“What the District of Columbia was trying to do was to protect toddlers from guns,” the Democratic candidate said about the decision in District of Columbia v. Heller.
“So they wanted people with guns to safely store them, and the court didn’t accept that reasonable regulation. But they’ve accepted many others, so I see no conflict between saving people’s lives and defending the Second Amendment,” Mrs. Clinton said.
Her ignorance is appalling. Heller wan't about toddlers. No where in any of the opinions, concurring or dissenting, do we find that they addressed toddlers at all. That's what the gun-banners do; when they're losing the argument, they make things up out of whole cloth.
1 comment:
They (and she) conflate the truth as it suits them...
Post a Comment