tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12389938.post818458241600864374..comments2024-03-18T21:37:45.026-05:00Comments on PawPaw's House: Calibration Error?Pawpawhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14959820068377494313noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12389938.post-27264472600936988512016-10-26T20:06:59.770-05:002016-10-26T20:06:59.770-05:00Having calibrated an electronic voting gizmo more ...Having calibrated an electronic voting gizmo more than once, I can say it's possible that the scenario in question is merely incompetence and not malfeasance. I have a degree in electronics and can say that, on the bright side, our electronic machine rarely worked, forcing disabled voters to go the manual route with assistance. On the other hand, those I assisted were (how do I put this politely?) idiots. Sigh. I'm glad I decided to stop working at the polling place.Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09800106790176447938noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12389938.post-11145055133189839552016-10-24T20:02:35.842-05:002016-10-24T20:02:35.842-05:0012.5% is the 'margin of cheat' as of now.....12.5% is the 'margin of cheat' as of now... sighOld NFOhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16404197287935017147noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12389938.post-43238514668660816802016-10-24T06:33:48.634-05:002016-10-24T06:33:48.634-05:00This is why they have been pushing electronic voti...This is why they have been pushing electronic voting, vs paper votes (not that they can't fake paper ballots, but it's harder), and how a number of counties in Ohio in the last election had 100% of the vote for Obama. Statistically, a 100% vote is impossible, as simply by voter error, the opponent would get some votes, never mind the number of people actually voting for the opponent. However, if you "fix" the machine, you will get 100% of the vote, and it sounds like the "fix" is in, good & hard.<br /><br />See also, the newest voter fraud video from Project Veritas.<br /><br />-- SteveAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com