Sunday, October 28, 2012

The Panetta Doctrine

Jonah Goldberg, over at NRO, deconstructs the Panetta Doctrine:
But there are two problems bigger problems with the Panetta doctrine. First, Panetta says they didn’t have real-time information. Uh, if having a live video feed and real-time reports from assets on the ground for hours doesn’t count as real-time information, what does? And if, as rumors suggest, the drones monitoring the situation were armed, the idea that the administration was trying to avoid some kind of “black hawk down” situation seems incomprehensible.
Which brings us to the second, I think bigger, problem with the Panetta doctrine. If the circumstances in Libya didn’t meet the “enough information” threshold for a rescue attempt or some other form of intervention, then what does? And, note, Panetta & Co. make it sound as if the decision to let the Americans on the scene twist in the wind was sort of a no-brainer, not a difficult decision. So what happened in Libya didn’t even come close to the threshold for intervention.
The Libyan debacle may be the single foreign policy problem that brings down the Obama administration. Like the Watergate scandal, the coverup may prove to be more damaging than the initial crime. And, lest we forget, nobody died during Watergate.

3 comments:

Old NFO said...

The "Panetta Doctrine" is BS and we both know it...

Ed Jones said...

Panetta beter be careful, he will end up like Foster and Aspin.

Skip said...

The difference between Watergate and this is the media was all over Watergate. Lybia....nada.